Internal cube used
The lab estimates product cube against package cube after allowing room for padding, folding, and order variability. Very low utilization flags avoidable void and DIM exposure.
Methodology
The calculator compares package candidates on cube utilization, billable weight, material cost, pack labor, void fill, and expected damage reserve. It is designed for screening packaging changes before a live carrier or warehouse pilot.
The lab estimates product cube against package cube after allowing room for padding, folding, and order variability. Very low utilization flags avoidable void and DIM exposure.
Dimensional weight is estimated as length x width x height divided by the selected DIM divisor, then compared with actual packed weight.
Material cost should include the package, seals, inserts, labels if separately stocked, and normal waste. It should not include one-off prototype pricing.
Labor converts seconds per order into a per-order cost using the selected hourly rate. The biggest gains usually come from removing folding, taping, and void-fill steps.
Damage reserve is directional: damage rate multiplied by expected order replacement/support cost. It keeps fragile-pack decisions from being judged on material cost alone.
The recommendation favors the lowest estimated total cost that still satisfies fit and damage constraints. It should be validated with a controlled pick-pack-ship pilot.